File talk:En-Myst.ogg
Spoken article quality assessment[edit]
Version reviewed: March 30, 2009
Technical quality: Medium
- Introduction and licensing information are appropriate.
- Standard recording format is used (44.1 kHz 16-bit mono).
- No distracting breathiness and relatively few post-processing artifacts (except as noted below).
- The following issues prevent this recording from achieving a "High" Technical rating:
- Noticeable pops at 1:27, 2:15, 9:14, 12:57, 13:29, 14:20 and 17:00.
- A first take at 1:30 that was accidentally left undeleted.
- Sections 3.1 onward have a high-pitched din (most discernible on external speakers) which suggests that different noise-reduction settings were used in this portion of the article. This artifact disappears in part of Section 5 (21:37–23:52).
- Other recommendations:
- There is a minor jump in the reader's volume at 11:06. Levelator is recommended to give the recording a consistent sound level.
Clarity: High
- The article is clearly enunciated and the speaker's voice is easily understood.
Accuracy: High
- The source material is faithfully reproduced with contents, infoboxes, quotations and images well "asided".
- Voice inflections are appropriate and pauses are well timed to separate phrases and sentences. Extended quotations in particular are well inflected.
- Minor deviations:
- 5:24 – "Objects and information discovered on one Age" (instead of "in one Age")
- 9:56 – "This company" (instead of "The company")
- 12:31 – Pronunciation of "palettes" ("pa-LETS" instead of "PAL-its")
Notes: {{{notes}}}
Help with recording issues can be obtained under "Recording assistance" here.
Information on the assessment procedure can be found on the spoken article assessment page.
Reviewed by: Tonyle (talk • contribs) 05:36, 2 April 2009 (UTC)